here is the list of the most famous ‘ism’ theories

Absurdism.

Absurdism is a philosophical theory closely related to both existentialism and nihilism. All three share a core belief: the universe lacks inherent meaning. However, they diverge significantly in how they respond to this realization.

Absurdism, most famously associated with Albert Camus (often regarded as the father of Absurdism), argues that human beings are natural meaning-seekers. Yet, the universe remains silent and indifferent to our search. This clash—between our persistent longing for purpose and the unresponsiveness of the cosmos—creates what Camus calls the absurd.

Camus explores this conflict in works like The Myth of Sisyphus, where he presents the story of Sisyphus condemned to roll a boulder uphill only for it to roll back down, endlessly. Camus sees this as a metaphor for the human condition. He argues that instead of succumbing to despair or resorting to false hope (such as religious faith or ideological systems), we should embrace the absurd and rebel against it. This rebellion, according to Camus, is not a call to change the universe, but a conscious decision to live fully, passionately, and authentically despite its meaninglessness.

In contrast, nihilism acknowledges the absence of intrinsic meaning but goes further by asserting that even the attempt to create personal meaning is ultimately futile. It leans toward a more pessimistic or even apathetic stance, often associated with a sense of despair or detachment.

Existentialism, meanwhile, parts ways with both absurdism and nihilism. While existentialists agree that the universe has no preordained purpose, they argue that individuals have the freedom—and indeed, the responsibility—to create their own meaning. Thinkers like Jean-Paul Sartre and Simone de Beauvoir champion the idea that personal meaning and values can be forged through choices, actions, and authentic living.

In short:

  • Absurdism: There is no meaning, but we should live defiantly and authentically in spite of this.
  • Nihilism: There is no meaning, and constructing one is pointless.
  • Existentialism: There is no meaning, but we can (and must) create our own.

Nihilism

Nihilism is a philosophical belief—often seen as a form of extreme pessimism—that life has no inherent meaning, value, or purpose. Nihilists argue that morality, truth, and even existence itself are ultimately meaningless. As a result, there is no rational reason to uphold moral principles or strive for meaning, since all human constructs—ethical, religious, or existential—are considered baseless illusions.

Nihilism challenges both religious and secular systems of value, including attempts to create one’s own meaning, which it often sees as equally futile. Famous nihilist thinkers include Friedrich Nietzsche, who both explored and criticized nihilism, seeing it as a crisis of Western civilization.

Existentialism

Existentialism is a philosophical movement that holds that life has no inherent or predetermined meaning, and that individuals are free—and indeed obligated—to create their own purpose, values, and identity through conscious choice and action. It emphasizes personal responsibility, authenticity, and the human struggle with freedom and meaning in an indifferent or even absurd universe.

While existentialism can be associated with angst or despair, many existentialists view it as an opportunity for radical freedom and self-creation.

Key existentialist thinkers include:

  • Søren Kierkegaard (often considered the father of existentialism), who focused on faith and the individual’s subjective experience,
  • Jean-Paul Sartre (the central figure of 20th-century existentialism), who famously declared that “existence precedes essence”,
  • Martin Heidegger, who explored being and time,
  • Karl Jaspers and Gabriel Marcel, who contributed from both philosophical and theological perspectives.

Essentialism

Essentialism is the philosophical theory that people and things possess an inherent, unchanging essence—a set of characteristics that define their true nature. This essence determines what a thing is, independent of external conditions or individual perception.

In contrast to existentialism, which asserts that individuals define themselves through their actions and choices, essentialism argues that a person’s nature is largely predetermined—by biology, purpose, or some universal truth.

For example, essentialists may argue that gender, morality, or identity is rooted in objective, immutable traits, whereas existentialists would view these as constructs that individuals shape themselves.

In short:

  • Essentialism: Essence precedes existence—you are born with a fixed nature.
  • Existentialism: Existence precedes essence—you define your own nature through choices.

Agathism

Agathism is the philosophical doctrine that, ultimately, all things tend toward good. It is distinct from optimism, which claims that everything is already for the best in the present moment. Agathism acknowledges that evil, suffering, and chaos exist, but holds that over time, all will lead to a greater good or final harmony. While optimism tends to deny or downplay current suffering, agathism embraces it as part of a longer moral arc that bends toward goodness.

Agnosticism

Agnosticism is a philosophical position developed by British biologist Thomas Henry Huxley in the 19th century. It maintains that the existence (or non-existence) of God, the divine, or the supernatural is unknowable—at least through logical reasoning or empirical science.

An agnostic neither affirms belief in God nor outright denies it. Instead, they suspend judgment, asserting that the nature of God (if such a being exists) is inherently beyond human comprehension. In essence, agnosticism deals with epistemology—what we can know—and emphasizes intellectual humility over definitive belief or disbelief.

Agnostic Theism

Agnostic theism is a philosophical viewpoint that combines elements of both theism and agnosticism. Agnostic theists believe in the existence of a God or higher power, but simultaneously acknowledge that the nature or existence of God cannot be proven through reason or science.

In this view, belief in God is a matter of faith or personal conviction, rather than evidence. Agnostic theists might say, “I believe God exists, but I don’t claim to know this for certain.”

Agnostic Deism

Agnostic deism is the belief that a God or divine force exists and created the universe, but that this God does not interfere with the world after its creation. Like traditional deism, agnostic deism rejects the idea of divine intervention, miracles, or ongoing revelation. However, it also incorporates the agnostic stance: it holds that the precise nature of God, or any direct knowledge about God, is unknowable.

In other words, an agnostic deist believes in a creator who set the universe in motion but then withdrew from its workings—and we cannot truly understand or know anything further about this divine being.

Anthropocentrism

Anthropocentrism is the philosophical belief—or worldview—that humans are the central or most significant entities in the universe. It places human beings at the top of a presumed hierarchy of life, often regarding humanity as more important, intelligent, or morally valuable than other forms of life.

This perspective is deeply embedded in many cultural, religious, and scientific traditions. While anthropocentrism has historically shaped advancements in civilization, ethics, and environmental control, it is also criticized—particularly in environmental philosophy—for promoting a mindset that justifies the exploitation of nature and non-human life.

In contrast, ecocentrism and biocentrism challenge anthropocentrism by suggesting that all living beings (or even ecosystems) have intrinsic value, regardless of their usefulness to humans.

Empiricism

Empiricism is the philosophical theory that all human knowledge originates primarily from sensory experience—that is, from observation, perception, and experimentation. According to empiricists, the mind begins as a blank slate (tabula rasa), and knowledge is gradually built through interaction with the external world.

Some of the most influential empiricist philosophers include:

  • Francis Bacon (often called the “Father of Empiricism”), who emphasized inductive reasoning and the scientific method,
  • John Locke, who argued that all knowledge comes from experience,
  • George Berkeley, who proposed that reality consists only of minds and their ideas,
  • David Hume, who questioned causality and the certainty of knowledge.

Empiricism stands in contrast to rationalism, which holds that reason and innate ideas are the primary sources of knowledge.

Rationalism

Rationalism is the philosophical theory that reason and logic are the primary sources of knowledge, as opposed to sensory experience (as in empiricism). Rationalists argue that certain truths—especially in mathematics, ethics, and metaphysics—can be known a priori, or independent of experience.

René Descartes, the father of modern rationalism, famously said “Cogito, ergo sum” (“I think, therefore I am”)—emphasizing thought as the foundation of all knowledge.

Other major rationalist philosophers include Baruch Spinoza and Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz.

Chronocentrism

Chronocentrism is the belief that the present moment in time—the current generation, era, or cultural moment—is more important, advanced, or superior than the past or the future. People influenced by chronocentrism often regard their current values, technologies, and ways of life as the most evolved or correct, sometimes dismissing past beliefs as primitive or outdated and future concerns as speculative or irrelevant.

This mindset can lead to historical arrogance or short-sightedness, making it difficult to appreciate the wisdom of previous generations or to plan responsibly for the future. In sociology and psychology, chronocentrism can manifest in generational bias, where people view their own age group as more relevant or impactful than others

Determinism

Determinism is the philosophical doctrine that every event, action, or state of affairs is the inevitable result of preceding causes and natural laws. In this view, free will is an illusion—our decisions are determined by prior events, genetics, environment, and psychological conditions.

There are different types of determinism:

  • Physical determinism: the universe operates like a machine, following physical laws.
  • Biological determinism: behavior is shaped by genetic or evolutionary factors.
  • Psychological determinism: mental states and actions are determined by past experiences.

Determinism poses challenging questions about freedom, morality, and responsibility—especially in ethics and legal philosophy.

Dualism

Dualism is the philosophical view that reality consists of two fundamentally different kinds of substances or principles—typically the mind and the body. This idea was most famously developed by René Descartes, who argued that the mind (or soul) is a non-physical, thinking substance, while the body is a physical, extended substance.

Cartesian dualism suggests that the mind and body interact but are essentially distinct, raising complex questions about consciousness, identity, and how immaterial thought can influence physical matter.

Monism

Monism is the opposing view to dualism. It holds that all things in the universe are ultimately made of the same substance or principle, and that apparent divisions (like mind and body) are illusions or manifestations of a single underlying reality.

There are different kinds of monism:

  • Material monism: everything is fundamentally physical or material.
  • Idealist monism: everything is ultimately mental or spiritual.
  • Neutral monism: both mind and matter are aspects of a more fundamental substance.

Many religious or spiritual philosophies are monistic. For instance, some forms of Hinduism or Pantheism view the universe as an expression of a single divine reality—whether called God, the Absolute, Nature, or the Universe.

Optimism

Optimism, in philosophy, refers to the belief that the world is the best of all possible worlds, or more generally, that life is fundamentally worth living and inclined toward good. This idea traces back to Leibniz, who argued that a perfect God would have created the best possible world among all potential options.

In ethics, optimism aligns with positive expectations, a belief in human potential, and often a moral duty to strive toward improvement and hope, despite hardships.

Pessimism

Pessimism is the philosophical or psychological tendency to expect the worst outcomes or to believe that evil and suffering outweigh good in life. A pessimistic worldview doubts human progress, questions whether life is worth living, and often assumes that decline, failure, or disappointment is more likely than success.

Philosophers like Arthur Schopenhauer advanced philosophical pessimism, arguing that human desire leads inevitably to suffering, and that nonexistence may be preferable to existence.

Pragmatism (Pragmaticism)

Pragmatism is a philosophical approach that emphasizes practical consequences and real-world applications as the basis for meaning and truth. A belief or idea is considered true if it works—that is, if it has practical utility in solving problems or guiding behavior.

Developed primarily in American philosophy by Charles Sanders Peirce, William James, and John Dewey, pragmatism resists abstract theorizing for its own sake and focuses on what ideas can do in everyday life.

(Note: The term pragmaticism was coined by Peirce to distinguish his own version of pragmatism from its broader, more popular use.)

Realism

In philosophy, realism is the belief that reality exists independently of our thoughts or perceptions. In other words, the world has an objective structure, and truth is discovered, not created.

In the arts, realism refers to the accurate, detailed, and unembellished depiction of everyday life. It rejects idealization, focusing instead on ordinary people, social realities, and observable facts.

Realism in both philosophy and the arts stands opposed to idealism, which emphasizes the mind’s role in shaping or generating reality.

Reconstructivism

Reconstructivism is a progressive philosophical and educational theory that asserts societies must constantly reform and rebuild themselves to adapt to changing needs, values, and challenges. It emphasizes critical thinking, social responsibility, and systemic change, aiming to improve government, education, and institutions.

Often applied in educational philosophy, reconstructivism seeks to empower individuals to become agents of positive change in the world

Stoicism

Stoicism is an ancient Greek philosophy that teaches the development of self-control, rational thinking, and emotional resilience as the path to true freedom and virtue. It holds that while we cannot control external events, we can control how we respond to them—through discipline and acceptance of what is beyond our power.

By understanding the universal reason (logos) and aligning one’s will with it, a Stoic aims to achieve inner peace (ataraxia) and live in accordance with nature.

Famous Stoics include Epictetus, Seneca, and Marcus Aurelius.

Stoicism in practice often overlaps with ideas of self-discipline, such as remaining calm and strong in the face of adversity.

Sentimentalism

Sentimentalism, in philosophy and psychology, is the idea that moral and emotional judgments arise from feeling or sentiment, rather than from reason alone. It emphasizes the role of empathy, compassion, and emotional response in how people relate to one another.

In everyday use, being sentimental often means expressing affection, nostalgia, or deep emotional sensitivity—such as sharing memories or giving thoughtful gifts tied to emotional meaning.

Philosophers like David Hume and Adam Smith are associated with moral sentimentalism, arguing that feelings of sympathy guide moral behavior.

Consequentialism

Consequentialism is an ethical theory that judges the morality of an action solely by its outcomes or consequences. If an action leads to good results, it is considered morally right; if it leads to bad results, it is wrong.

The most well-known form of consequentialism is utilitarianism, which seeks to maximize happiness or well-being for the greatest number of people.

The core idea: “The ends justify the means.”

Jeremy Bentham is considered the founder of classical utilitarianism, later developed by John Stuart Mill.

Universalism

Universalism is the belief that moral principles, truths, or values can be applied universally, regardless of culture, time, or context. It argues that there are objective standards of right and wrong that are binding on all human beings.

In ethics, universalism contrasts with relativism, which holds that moral values depend on cultural or personal context.

Universalism also appears in religion, where it may refer to the belief that all souls will ultimately be saved, or that divine truth applies to all people.

Posthumanism

Posthumanism is a philosophical and cultural movement that questions traditional views about what it means to be “human.” It challenges human-centered (anthropocentric) thinking and explores how humans might evolve—biologically, technologically, or ethically—beyond their current form.

Key ideas include:

  • The integration of humans with technology (cyborgs, AI, neural implants).
  • Ethical concerns about how we treat non-human life, including animals, robots, and ecosystems.
  • Moving beyond the belief that humans are the central or most important beings in the universe.

Posthumanism doesn’t just imagine sci-fi futures—it also critiques modern humanism, offering a more interconnected, eco-centric, and tech-aware worldview. It’s at the frontier of philosophy, art, and science fiction.

Related Posts